THE BIGGEST SCOOP OF THE YEAR:
So why isn't the mainstream media reporting it?
By now, it is apparent to everyone not blinded by fierce partisan loyalty or lust for war profits that President Bush, aided by his Neocon co-conspirators, lied to trick this nation into a war of conquest against the people of Iraq. The evidence is overwhelming.
1. There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
2. Iraq was not supporting and aiding Al Qaeda.
3. Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11.
Bush's parasitic sycophants have tried to claim that all these misstatements were 'bad intelligence', i.e. honest mistakes anyone could make. But as will be shown below, the case for war was based on deliberate lies, faked documents, and deceptive photos.
The mainstream media has, of late, attempted to recover some of their lost credibility and audience by following the bloggers' leads in recent stories. A prime example is the case of the London bombers, originally claimed to be suicide bombers. Yet when the bloggers pointed out the obvious inconsistencies with the suicides claim, the mainstream media belatedly (and grudgingly) agreed that the facts pointed to four innocent men tricked into carrying bombs onto the subway. While the obvious answer is that these men thought they had been hired as part of the ongoing terror drill, the mainstream media still spins the story to point at a mythical Al Qaeda mastermind, who just sorta, kinda, happened to stage his attacks at the very same time and place as the terror drill.
But if one wants to judge the mainstream media, there really is only one litmus test. Even as the media lionizes Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein for (partly) exposing the Nixon criminality, today's mainstream media stares the news story of a lifetime in the face and remains conspicuously silen"
So why isn't the mainstream media reporting it?
By now, it is apparent to everyone not blinded by fierce partisan loyalty or lust for war profits that President Bush, aided by his Neocon co-conspirators, lied to trick this nation into a war of conquest against the people of Iraq. The evidence is overwhelming.
1. There were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
2. Iraq was not supporting and aiding Al Qaeda.
3. Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11.
Bush's parasitic sycophants have tried to claim that all these misstatements were 'bad intelligence', i.e. honest mistakes anyone could make. But as will be shown below, the case for war was based on deliberate lies, faked documents, and deceptive photos.
The mainstream media has, of late, attempted to recover some of their lost credibility and audience by following the bloggers' leads in recent stories. A prime example is the case of the London bombers, originally claimed to be suicide bombers. Yet when the bloggers pointed out the obvious inconsistencies with the suicides claim, the mainstream media belatedly (and grudgingly) agreed that the facts pointed to four innocent men tricked into carrying bombs onto the subway. While the obvious answer is that these men thought they had been hired as part of the ongoing terror drill, the mainstream media still spins the story to point at a mythical Al Qaeda mastermind, who just sorta, kinda, happened to stage his attacks at the very same time and place as the terror drill.
But if one wants to judge the mainstream media, there really is only one litmus test. Even as the media lionizes Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein for (partly) exposing the Nixon criminality, today's mainstream media stares the news story of a lifetime in the face and remains conspicuously silen"
posted by gr8fuldaniel | 9:53 PM
